U&ME Workshop @ ECCV 2026
The 2026 update expands the original Genμ concept-unlearning benchmark into a broader privacy-preserving suite co-located with the U&ME Workshop at ECCV 2026. Three tracks test whether a generative model can forget one specified identity or concept without damaging nearby identities, attributes, styles, or general generation quality.
Key dates for the 2026 edition.
Challenge participants may independently submit a paper describing their method to the U&ME Workshop through the regular review process. The workshop paper deadline is 9 July 2026. Paper submission and challenge artifact submission happen in parallel; entering the challenge does not automatically submit a paper.
The two highest-ranked eligible teams will be invited to co-author the Genμ 2.0 competition report. A team is eligible only if it finishes in the top two and exceeds the relevant official baseline for its track. The report will be prepared after evaluation for the workshop camera-ready stage.
Use the Google Form for the selected track. A separate form is used for each track.
Upload the final unlearned weights, checkpoint, or adapter to a drive or cloud-storage provider and enable access for evaluation.
Provide a GitHub repository containing unlearning code, inference code, environment files, and the exact commit or release tag.
Document setup, commands, inputs, expected outputs, hardware requirements, and any track-specific preprocessing needed to reproduce the submission.
For any submission-related query, contact genmu.challenge.2025@gmail.com.
Face and speech participants may use any suitable generative model. The suggested models are examples only; every submission must identify its exact architecture, upstream checkpoint, conditioning interface, and inference procedure.
Given a face generator and a specified target identity, modify the model so that its normal identity-conditioning route can no longer reproduce or verify that person. At the same time, preserve the model's ability to generate the provided retain identities, preserve non-identity attributes, and maintain visual quality.
Given a TTS or voice-cloning model and a target speaker, modify the model so that generated speech is no longer recognized as that speaker. Preserve the transcript, naturalness, prosody, accent or style attributes required by the subtask, and the voices of acoustically similar retain speakers.
Given Stable Diffusion v1.4 and a target concept, erase the concept for direct, indirect, and adversarial prompts. Preserve unrelated and semantically adjacent concepts, general image-generation utility, and robustness with minimal unnecessary parameter change.
For both identity tracks, the only leaderboard ranking metric is ERB: the harmonic mean of erasure accuracy \((100-\mathrm{FA})\) and retain accuracy. Geometry, attributes, prosody, quality, and intelligibility are reported separately for analysis and do not contribute to rank. See the exact Face formula and Speech formula.
These are optional starting points, not mandatory base models. See the Baselines page for descriptions and official references.